## The Shapes of Molecules (VSEPR Theory) and Orbital Hybridization

Contents

The Valence Shell Electron Pair Repulsion (VSEPR) theory is a simple and useful way to predict and rationalize the shapes of molecules. The theory is based on the idea of minimizing the electrostatic repulsion between electron pairs, as first proposed by Sidgwick and Powell in 1940, then generalized by Gillespie and Nyholm in 1957, and then broadly applied over the intervening 50+ years.

To use the VSEPR model, one begins with the Lewis dot picture to determine the number of lone pairs and bonding domains around a central atom. Because VSEPR considers all bonding domains equally (i.e., a single bond, a double bond, and a half bond all count as one electron domain), one can use either an octet or hypervalent structure, provided that the number of lone pairs (which should be the same in both) is calculated correctly. For example, in either the hypervalent or octet structure of the I_{3}^{–}ion above, there are three lone pairs on the central I atom and two bonding domains. We then follow these steps to obtain the **electronic geometry**:

- Determine the number of lone pairs on the central atom in the molecule, and add the number of bonded atoms (a.k.a. bonding domains)
- This number (the
*steric number*) defines the electronic shape of the molecule by minimizing repulsion. For example a steric number of three gives a trigonal planar electronic shape. - The angles between electron domains are determined primarily by the electronic geometry (e.g., 109.5° for a steric number of 4, which implies that the electronic shape is a tetrahedron)
- These angles are adjusted by the hierarchy of repulsions: (lone pair – lone pair) > (lone pair – bond) > (bond – bond)

The **molecular geometry** is deduced from the electronic geometry by considering the lone pairs to be present but invisible. The most commonly used methods to determine molecular structure – X-ray diffraction, neutron diffraction, and electron diffraction – have a hard time seeing lone pairs, but they can accurately determine the lengths of bonds between atoms and the bond angles.

The table below gives examples of electronic and molecular shapes for steric numbers between 2 and 9. We are most often concerned with molecules that have steric numbers between 2 and 6.

From the Table, we see that some of the molecules shown as examples have bond angles that depart from the ideal electronic geometry. For example, the H-N-H bond angle in ammonia is 107°, and the H-O-H angle in water is 104.5°. We can rationalize this in terms of the last rule above. The lone pair in ammonia repels the electrons in the N-H bonds more than they repel each other. This lone pair repulsion exerts even more steric influence in the case of water, where there are two lone pairs. Similarly, the axial F-S-F angle in the “seesaw” molecule SF_{4} is a few degrees less than 180° because of repulsion by the lone pair in the molecule.

## Geometrical isomers

For some molecules in the Table, we note that there is more than one possible shape that would satisfy the VSEPR rules. For example, the XeF_{2} molecule has a steric number of five and a trigonal bipyramidal geometry. There are three possible stereoisomers: one in which the F atoms occupy axial sites, resulting in linear molecule, one in which the F atoms occupy one equatorial and one axial site (resulting in a 90° bond angle), and one in which the F atoms are both on equatorial sites, with a F-Xe-F bond angle of 120°.

The observed geometry of XeF_{2} is linear, which can be rationalized by considering the orbitals that are used to make bonds (or lone pairs) in the axial and equatorial positions. There are four available orbitals, s, p_{x}, p_{y}, and p_{z}. If we choose the z-axis as the axial direction, we can see that the p_{x} and p_{y} orbitals lie in the equatorial plane. We assume that the spherical s orbital is shared equally by the five electron domains in the molecule, the two axial bonds share the p_{z} orbital, and the three equatorial bonds share the p_{x} and p_{y} orbitals. We can then calculate the bond orders to axial and equatorial F atoms as follow.

Because fluorine is more electronegative than a lone pair, it prefers the axial site where it will have more negative formal charge. In general, by this reasoning, lone pairs and electropositive ligands such as CH_{3} will always prefer the equatorial sites in the trigonal bipyramidal geometry. Electronegative ligands such as F will always go to the axial sites.

In the case of the BrF_{4}^{–} anion, which is isoelectronic with XeF_{4} in the Table, the electronic geometry is octahedral and there are two possible isomers in which the two lone pairs are *cis* or *trans* to each other. In this case, lone pair – lone pair repulsion dominates and we obtain the *trans* arrangement of lone pairs, giving a square planar molecular geometry.

## Orbital hybridization

The observation of molecules in the various electronic shapes shown above is, at first blush, in conflict with our picture of atomic orbitals. For an atom such as oxygen, we know that the 2s orbital is spherical, and that the 2p_{x}, 2p_{y}, and 2p_{z} orbitals are dumbell-shaped and point along the Cartesian axes. The water molecule contains two hydrogen atoms bound to oxygen not at a 90° angle, but at an angle of 104.5°. Given the relative orientations of the atomic orbitals, how do we arrive at angles between electron domains of 104.5°, 120°, and so on? To understand this we will need to learn a little bit about the quantum mechanics of electrons in atoms and molecules.

The atomic orbitals ψ represent solutions to the **Schrödinger wave equation**

This is the equation that Erwin Schrödinger famously derived in 1926 to solve for the energies and shapes of the s, p, d, and f atomic orbitals in hydrogen-like atoms. It was a huge conceptual leap for both physics and chemistry because it not only explained the quantized energy levels of the hydrogen atom, but also provided the theoretical basis for the octet rule and the arrangement of elements in the periodic table.

The Schrödinger equation can be used to describe chemical systems that are more complicated than the hydrogen atom (e.g., multi-electron atoms, molecules, infinite crystals, and the dynamics of those systems) if we substitute the appropriate potential energy function V(r,t) into the Hamiltonian. The math becomes more complicated and the equation must be solved numerically in those cases, so for our purposes we will stick with the simplest case of time-invariant, one-electron, hydrogen-like atoms.

Without going into too much detail about the Schrödinger equation, we can point out some of its most important properties:

- The equation derives from the fact that the total energy (E) is the sum of the kinetic energy (KE) and the potential energy (PE). These three quantities are represented mathematically as
**operators**in the equation. - On the left side of the equation, the total energy operator (E) is a scalar that is multiplied by the wavefunction ψ. ψ is a function of the spatial coordinates (x,y,z) and is related to the probability that the electron is at that point in space.
- The first term on the right side of the equation represents the kinetic energy (KE). The kinetic energy operator is proportional to ∇
^{2}(the Laplacian operator) which takes the second derivative (with respect to three spatial coordinates) of ψ. Thus, the Schrödinger equation is a**differential equation**. - The second term on the right side of the equation represents the Coulomb potential (PE), i.e. the attractive energy between the positively charged nucleus and the negatively charged electron.
- The solutions to the Schrödinger equation are a set of
**energies**E (which are scalar quantities) and**wavefunctions**(a.k.a.**atomic orbitals**) ψ, which are functions of the spatial coordinates. You will sometimes see the energies referred to as*eigenvalues*and the orbitals as*eigenfunctions*, because mathematically the Schrödinger equation is an eigenfunction-eigenvalue equation. Although ψ is a function of the coordinates, E is not. So an electron in a 2p_{z}orbital has the same total energy E (= PE + KE) no matter where it is in space. - These E values and their associated wavefunctions ψ are catalogued according to their
**quantum numbers***n,**l,*and*m*That is, there are many solutions to the differential equation, and each solution (ψ(xyz) and E) has a unique set of quantum numbers. Some sets of orbitals are_{l}.**degenerate**, meaning that they have the same energy (e.g., 2p_{x}, 2p_{y}, and 2p_{z}). - The solutions ψ(xyz) to the Schrödinger equation (e.g., the 1s, 2s, 2p
_{x}, 2p_{y}, and 2p_{z}orbitals) represent**probability amplitudes**for finding the electron at a particular point (x,y,z) in space. A probability amplitude can have either**+ or – sign**. We typically represent the different signs by shading or by + and – signs on the two lobes of a 2p orbital. - The square of the probability amplitude, ψ
^{2}, is always a positive number and represents the**probability**of finding the electron at a point x,y,z in space. Because the total probability of finding the electron somewhere is 1, the wavefunction must be**normalized**so that the integral of ψ^{2}over the spatial coordinates (from -∞ to +∞) is 1. - The solutions to the Schrödinger equation are
**orthogonal**, meaning that the product of any two (integrated over all space) is zero. For example the product of the 2s and 2p_{x}orbitals, integrated over the spatial coordinates from -∞ to +∞, is zero.

Orbital hybridization involves making *linear combinations* of the atomic orbitals that are solutions to the Schrödinger equation. Mathematically, this is justified by recognizing that the Schrödinger equation is a *linear* differential equation. As such, any sum of solutions to the Schrödinger equation is also a valid solution. However, we still impose the constraint that our hybrid orbitals must be **orthogonal** and **normalized**.

###### Rules for orbital hybridization:

- Add and subtract atomic orbitals to get hybrid orbitals.
- We get the same number of orbitals out as we put in.
- The energy of a hybrid orbital is the weighted average of the atomic orbitals that make it up.
- The coefficients are determined by the constraints that the hybrid orbitals must be orthogonal and normalized.

For **sp hybridization**, as in the BeF_{2} or CO_{2} molecule, we make two linear combinations of the 2s and 2p_{z} orbitals (assigning z as the axis of the Be-F bond):

Here we have simply added and subtracted the 2s and 2pz orbitals; we leave it as an exercise for the interested student to show that both orbitals are normalized.

What this means physically is explained in the figure below. By combining the 2s and 2p_{z} orbitals we have created two new orbitals with large lobes (high electron probability) pointing along the z-axis. These two orbitals are degenerate and have an energy that is halfway between the energy of the 2s and 2p_{z} orbitals.

For an isolated Be atom, which has two valence electrons, the lowest energy state would have two electrons spin-paired in the 2s orbital. However, these electrons would not be available for bonding. By **promoting** these electrons to the degenerate 2sp_{z} hybrid orbitals, they become unpaired and are prepared for bonding to the F atoms in BeF_{2}. This will occur if the **bonding energy** (in the promoted state) exceeds the promotion energy. The **overall bonding energy**, i.e., the energy released by combining a Be atom in its ground state with two F atoms, is the difference between the bonding and promotion energies.

We can similarly construct **sp ^{2} hybrids** (e.g., for the BF

_{3}molecule or the NO

_{3}

^{–}anion) from one 2s and two 2p atomic orbitals. Taking the plane of the molecule as the xy plane, we obtain three hybrid orbitals at 120° to each other. The three hybrids are:

The lobes of the **sp ^{3} hybrid** orbitals point towards the vertices of a tetrahedron (or alternate corners of a cube), consistent with the tetrahedral bond angle in CH

_{4}and the nearly tetrahedral angles in NH

_{3}and H

_{2}O. Similarly, we can show that we can construct the trigonal bipyramidal electronic shape by making sp and sp

^{2}hybrids, and the octahedral geometry from three sets of sp hybrids. The picture that emerges from this is that the atomic orbitals can hybridize as required by the shape that best minimizes electron pair repulsions.

Interestingly however, the bond angles in PH_{3}, H_{2}S and H_{2}Se are close to 90°, suggesting that P, S, and Se primarily use their p-orbitals in bonding to H in these molecules. This is consistent with the fact that the energy difference between s and p orbitals stays roughly constant going down the periodic table, but the bond energy *decreases* as the valence electrons get farther away from the nucleus. In compounds of elements in the 3rd, 4th, and 5th rows of the periodic table, there thus is a *decreasing tendency to use s-p orbital hybrids in bonding*. For these heavier elements, the bonding energy is not enough to offset the energy needed to promote the s electrons to s-p hybrid orbitals.